On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:59 AM Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> And now for last 15 days: > > https://fstat.gluster.org/summary?start_date=2019-03-25&end_date=2019-04-10 > > ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t 18 ==> Fixed through > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22481/, I don't see this > failing in brick mux post 5th April > The above patch has been sent to fix the failure with brick mux enabled. > ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t 17 ==> happens only in brick mux, needs > analysis. > ./tests/basic/uss.t 15 ==> happens in both brick mux and non > brick mux runs, test just simply times out. Needs urgent analysis. > Nothing has changed in snapview-server and snapview-client recently. Looking into it. ./tests/basic/ec/ec-fix-openfd.t 13 ==> Fixed through > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/22508/ , patch merged today. > ./tests/basic/volfile-sanity.t 8 ==> Some race, though this succeeds > in second attempt every time. > > There're plenty more with 5 instances of failure from many tests. We need > all maintainers/owners to look through these failures and fix them, we > certainly don't want to get into a stage where master is unstable and we > have to lock down the merges till all these failures are resolved. So > please help. > > (Please note fstat stats show up the retries as failures too which in a > way is right) > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:27 PM Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> [1] captures the test failures report since last 30 days and we'd need >> volunteers/component owners to see why the number of failures are so high >> against few tests. >> >> [1] >> https://fstat.gluster.org/summary?start_date=2019-01-26&end_date=2019-02-25&job=all >> > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel