Raghavendra, I'm a little worried to switching to 3.x yet since users are reporting crashes and file corruptions. 2.0.6 has been running great for me except of few things, so I might have to wait and maybe try 2.0.9 as Gordan suggested.
Thanks, Alex On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Raghavendra G <raghaven...@gluster.com>wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Sorry for the delayed response. > > Can you try with 3.0.2rc1 which can be downloaded from > > http://ftp.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/glusterfs-3.0.2rc1.tar.gz > > If you still face the issue, please send us the log files of client and > servers. We will work on it. > > regards, > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Alex Attarian <u2sas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I have 3 server AFR setup, two servers are in a local net and one server >> is remote in another location using Gluster 2.0.6. I have also 5 local >> clients that are connected to all 3 servers. Reads are mostly slow because >> of the connection to the 3rd server, however I thought enabling >> read-subvolume and saying to read from one of the local nodes would solve >> that. However, I still see reads going to the 3rd node, although I specified >> read-subvolume local-node2. >> When I disable the 3rd server on all clients inside AFR, reads become very >> fast, which makes me assume that it's the reads to the remote server that is >> making everything slow. >> >> Is it not working or broken in 2.0.6? >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@nongnu.org >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> > > > -- > Raghavendra G > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel