Shishir, Is this in reference to the dht open file rebalance (of replaying the operations to the destination server)? I am assuming so, as that is something which has to be handled.
The other question is how should fallocate/discard be handled by self-heal in AFR. I'm not sure how important it is, but will be certainly good to bounce some ideas off here. Maybe we should implement a fiemap fop to query extents/holes and replay them in the other serverl? Avati On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Bharata B Rao <bharata....@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Avati, Brian, > > During the recently held gluster meetup, Shishir mentioned about a > potential problem (related to fd migration etc) in the zerofill > implementation (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5327/) and also > mentioned that same/similar issues are present with fallocate and > discard implementations. Since zerofill has been modelled on > fallocate/discard, I was wondering if it would be possible to address > these issues in fallocate/discard first so that we could potentially > follow the same in zerofill implementation. > > Regards, > Bharata. > -- > http://raobharata.wordpress.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel