Re: [Gluster-devel] Bug in locks deletion upon disconnet

[Anand Avati]

I have a fix in the works for this (with more cleanups to locks xlator)

Avati


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Raghavendra Bhat <rab...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a bug in the ltable cleanup when disconnect is received
> in 3.5 and master. Its easy to reproduce. Just create a replicate volume.
> Start running dbench on the mount point, and do graph changes. The brick
> processes will crash while doing the ltable cleanup.
>
> Pranith and me looked at the code and found the below issues.
>
> static void
> ltable_delete_locks (struct _lock_table *ltable)
> {
>         struct _locker *locker = NULL;
>         struct _locker *tmp    = NULL;
>
>         list_for_each_entry_safe (locker, tmp, &ltable->inodelk_lockers,
> lockers) {
>             if (locker->fd)
>                         pl_del_locker (ltable, locker->volume,
> &locker->loc,
>                                        locker->fd, &locker->owner,
>                                        GF_FOP_INODELK);
>                 GF_FREE (locker->volume);
>                 GF_FREE (locker);
>         }
>
>         list_for_each_entry_safe (locker, tmp, &ltable->entrylk_lockers,
> lockers) {
>                 if (locker->fd)
>                         pl_del_locker (ltable, locker->volume,
> &locker->loc,
>                                        locker->fd, &locker->owner,
>                                        GF_FOP_ENTRYLK);
>                 GF_FREE (locker->volume);
>                 GF_FREE (locker);
>         }
>         GF_FREE (ltable);
> }
>
> In above function, the list of indelks and entrylks is traversed and
> pl_del_locker is called for each lock with fd. But in pl_del_locker, we are
> collecting all the locks with same volume and owner sent as arguments and
> deleting them at once (that too without unlocking them). But for locks
> without fd, we are directly freeing up the objects without deleting them
> from the list (and without holding the ltable lock).
>
> This is the bug logged for the issue.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042764
>
> Regards,
> Raghavendra Bhat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel