On 07/03/2014, at 4:13 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > As a counterpoint to the current GlusterFS proposal, I've written up a bunch > of > ideas that I'm collectively calling GlusterFS Quattro. It's in Google Docs so > that people can comment. Please do. ;) > > http://goo.gl/yE3O4j
This one would make implementation behind firewalls a lot easier/possible: "... we should revive the notion (already implemented in HekaFS ages ago) of having a single daemon on a single port provide service for many bricks." Port usage at the moment is such a pain (and not just for scalability). :/ + Justin -- Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel