On 03/09/2014 02:39 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Memory usage seems better than in beta3. I have been building software
in a glusterfs volume for a few hours, and glusterfsd memory footprint
is still reasonable. And it did not crash.
There have been fixes checked in on that front, or I am just lucky?
Do not observe any fixes related to memory leaks. Would it be possible
to get a valgrind report for the glusterfsd processes if you happen to
observe the leak again?
Thanks,
Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
