Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > Does look like most of the memory consumption in here is coming from > inode_ctx allocations across translators. This certainly seems to point > towards a missing inode_unref().
Is it possible that it could be linked with the FUSE implementation? > I assume that you have eager locks set to off by default in your > testing. Apart from this, are there other volume configuration changes? Just memory statistics. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
