On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 07:16 +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 12/04/2014, at 5:37 AM, James wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > I hope there are no objections, but I requested a bug tracker for
> > Puppet-Gluster, and they stuck it under the GlusterFS project. I did
> > this because many new features and tweaks were requested, and I was
> > loosing track and figured I'd experiment more with BZ.
> > 
> > Now, if you want a feature or find a bug, I'll ask that you open a
> > ticket, and when I patch it, I'll ask for testing and ideally, at least
> > one ACK before merging to master and closing the bug.
> > 
> > New bugs here:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS&component=puppet-gluster
> > 
> > If you have issues to raise, although an email to me is probably a good
> > first point of contact too.
> > 
> > HTH, and let me know if you have any feedback about this process.
> 
> Is there value in adding this to Gerrit, so people can use the Gluster review
> process for it as well? :)
Actually, I think no. Puppet-Gluster is still small, (just a hobby,
won't be big and professional like gnu). If it gets out of hand I'll
reconsider the need.

Cheers!
James

> 
> + Justin
> 
> --
> Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
> 
> twitter.com/realjustinclift
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to