Hi Justin,
I did not use GlusterFS on the host system, I tried just using XFS
and ext4 to see if it would pass posix-compliance, but the issue is that
they do not. My hope is that someone shows me that I am doing something
wrong, or forgot some switch because it just seems weird that they
cannot pass on local filesystems.
- Luis
On 04/14/2014 10:45 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 15/04/2014, at 3:11 AM, Luis Pabon wrote:
Hi guys,
I am investigating running smoke tests inside Docker.io, but I cannot seem
to pass the posix-compliance tests. I then tried to run the posix-compliance
tests on XFS and EXT4 but I could make them pass there either. This is what I
did:
$ truncate -s 5G mydisk
$ sudo mkfs.xfs mydisk
$ sudo mount -o loop mydisk /mnt
$ cd /mnt
* Change the value of 'fs' in ~/qa/tools/posix-compliance/conf according to the
file system format.
$ prove -r ~/qa/tools/posix-compliance/tests
They always fail on chown tests. Anyone know why?
Which OS, and which release or git repo branch of Gluster?
If CentOS 6.5 and upstream master, then what kernel version are you
running? I had problems with one of the recent CentOS 6.5 kernels, but
a subsequent update to the newest one about a week ago
(<something>11.<something> in the name) fixed it.
+ Justin
- Luis
--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel