Le jeudi 05 novembre 2015 à 07:13 -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY a écrit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 11/05/2015 07:08 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le jeudi 05 novembre 2015 à 12:44 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit : > >> [fixed CC to [email protected]] > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 06:13:52AM -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > >>> <top post> How about devel.gluster.org? Or upload.gluster.org? > >>> > >>> Either one would be reasonable for nightly coverity/clang/etc > >>> reports as well as community uploads? > >>> > >>> </top post> > >> > >> devel.gluster.org sounds good to me. We will use it for > >> uploading, but also downloading, unless the uploads get > >> replicated to download.gluster.org and we use that as the only > >> public accessible download system. > > > > I am ok with that, but there is a risk of confusion with > > dev.gluster.org :) > > That's just another name for review.gluster.org, right? I'm not sure > why we need two names.
I agree we don't, but I do not want to break too much people habits and/or script somewhere (like, do gerrit use review in the config, or dev.gluster.org ? ). I would also start to have a naming scheme for servers, and a name for the service ( see for example download.gluster.org, download.gluster.org is the service and download01.rax.gluster.org is the server), as it will ease future migration. -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
