The detail in this response is much appreciated. Thank you. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote: > For Fedora/RHEL/CentOS rpms: > > + People file bugs, e.g. against Fedora/glusterfs or > GlusterFS/packaging, and we fix them. > > + Some of us occasionally do package reviews for new packages and/or > closely follow the Fedora packaging guidelines and when we see something > that ought to be done in the glusterfs packaging we fix it. > > + Every once in a while I run rpmlint and address the things it finds. > > + And of course we get feedback from downstream packaging. > > + Finally, I keep the Fedora dist-git .spec and our upstream .spec in > sync. > > For SuSE RPMs I use a .spec file based on the one that SuSE uses/used > for their distribution's bundled packages. > > For Debian/Ubuntu debs I use packaging bits provided by Louis Zuckerman > (irc nick: semiosis) that he developed with, I believe, the help of > Patrick Matthaei, the Debian packager who builds Debian's bundled > packages. Resyncing with Patrick's packaging bits is on my list of > things to do in my copious spare time. In the mean time people > occasionally report issues with the debs and I fix them.
-- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> _______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra