Paul Kölle wrote :
Hmm, if I read this right, there is no difference in blocksize:
(Olivier) Ubuntu (corrected):
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file_test count=262144 bs=1024
262144+0 records in
262144+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5,56942 s, 48,2 MB/s
(Olivier) Lenny:
lenny:# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file_test count=262144 bs=1024
262144+0 enregistrements lus
262144+0 enregistrements écrits
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 82,408 s, 3,3 MB/s
(mine) Lenny, 3.0.2:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/gluster_mount/file_test count=262144 bs=1024
262144+0 records in
262144+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6.54638 s, 41.0 MB/s
Im still on kernel 2.6.18 though...
That set me thinking and I can confirm such a difference using either
2.6.18 or 2.6.26 kernel. Here are the results with both of them:
* Debian/Lenny w/ vernel v2.6.26-2-amd64
~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test_file count=262144 bs=1024
262144+0 enregistrements lus
262144+0 enregistrements écrits
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 72,2034 s, 3,7 MB/s
* Debian/Lenny w/ kernel v2.6.18-6-amd64 (amd64)
~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test_file count=262144 bs=1024
262144+0 enregistrements lus
262144+0 enregistrements écrits
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7,53942 s, 35,6 MB/s
As you can see, dd'ing is about 10 times faster with kernel 2.6.18!
Anyway, postmark benching is quite equivalent regardless the kernel
version so it does not really make me satisfied for a webservers farm! :)
PS: the client machine I used here for these tests is an old Pentium(R)
D 2.80GHz with 2GBytes of RAM.
Just in case it can help, thought.
Thanks and best regards,
--
Olivier
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
