On 02/21/2011 12:05 PM, Brent A Nelson wrote:
Those who are looking for better metadata performance might want to see if MooseFS fits their needs. It uses a metadata server which caches the entire filesystem metadata in RAM, so it seems to be very responsive. I have my home directory on GlusterFS and I did a quick trial on MooseFS. du on GlusterFS (native FUSE, not NFS) was 1 minute 8 seconds, du on MooseFS was 2 seconds.
du isn't metadata intensive. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics Inc. email: land...@scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615 _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
