I don't expect and haven't made many volume changes, so the maintenance involved transferring files every so often versus maintenance of another puzzle piece that can fail is a no brainer for me. But I'm sure many others have more complicated and ever changing setups than me.
-Tony --------------------------- Manager, IT Operations Format Dynamics, Inc. P: 303-228-7327 F: 303-228-7305 abia...@formatdynamics.com http://www.formatdynamics.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:jl...@duke.edu] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:02 AM > To: Anthony J. Biacco > Cc: José Celano; gluster-users@gluster.org > Subject: RE: [Gluster-users] Scaling Gluster > > On Mon, 23 May 2011 at 9:55am, Anthony J. Biacco wrote > > > I think i read somewhere the server in the mount string is only used to > retrieve the cluster config. So as long as that server is up at time of mount, > you're fine. > > If the server goes down after mount, it doesnt matter as the cluster config > on the mounting servers knows about all gluster servers. > > Somebody correct me if i'm wrong. > > That's correct -- it's the mount-time failure that ucarp can help avoid. > > > Personally, i copy the cluster config to all my mounting servers and use > > that file in the mount command instead of a gluster server hostname. > > But then you lose the ability to easily and automatically distribute > configuration changes made via the 'gluster' command on the servers. I'm > not saying that can't be worked around, but everything is a tradeoff. > > -- > Joshua Baker-LePain > QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin > UCSF _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
