On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> Again, let me note two things:
> - the current code has a lot more (other) problems than the 2.X tree, that is
> why we won't use that.
> - if one has to look at the code to find out the basic problem he is not the
> target person of our question.

To which I would suggest that if such a fundamental problem were known
about, it would have been fixed long ago.

IMO your best bet is to raise a bug report in bugzilla.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to