John Mark Walker wrote:
In general, I don't recommend any distributed filesystems for VM images, but I
can also see that this is the wave of the future.
Ok. I can see that.
Let's say that I take a slightly looser approach to high-availability:
- keep the static parts of my installs on local disk
- share and replicate dynamic data using gluster
- failover by rebooting on a different node (no image to worry about
migrating)
In this scenario, how well does gluster work when:
- storage and processing are inter-mixed on the same nodes
- data is triply replicated (allow for 2-node failures)
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
