Hi Khoi,

I found a large changelog in the source package 
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.3.2.tar.gz 

For production, depends on what you are going to do.
If you work a lot with virtual machine, then 3.4.0 will probably what you want.

We are stay with 3.3.2 (upgrdae to night) until 3.4.1 is releases.

Grtz, Jiri

On Jul 22, 2013, at 4:43 PM, "Khoi Mai" <khoi...@up.com> wrote:

> Where may I find release docs. on what is new on 3.3.2, and which release 
> should I lean towards if I want to head into production?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Khoi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        gluster-users-requ...@gluster.org
> To:        gluster-users@gluster.org
> Date:        07/19/2013 06:59 AM
> Subject:        Gluster-users Digest, Vol 63, Issue 62
> Sent by:        gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org
> 
> 
> 
> Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to
>                 gluster-users@gluster.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>                 http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>                 gluster-users-requ...@gluster.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>                 gluster-users-ow...@gluster.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gluster-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: One node goes offline, the other node can't see the
>      replicated volume anymore (Greg Scott)
>   2. Re: GlusterFS 3.4.0 and 3.3.2 released! (Jacob Yundt)
>   3. How do I rotate **all** the Gluster logs? (Greg Scott)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:20:28 +0000
> From: Greg Scott <gregsc...@infrasupport.com>
> To: 'Ben Turner' <btur...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] One node goes offline, the other node
>                 can't see the replicated volume anymore
> Message-ID:
>                 <9de1ce076e1d4a4f9d3cc5193a12041e@mail2013.infrasupport.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> > You can set the timeout with:
> >
> > $ gluster volume set <volname> network.ping-timeout <N>
> >
> > I don't usually set it to anything under 20.
> >
> 
> I was just getting ready to put this in, but a bunch more questions are 
> filling my head.  The biggie is, how do I look up the current setting?  
> Gluster volume info doesn't show me that number.  Is there something else 
> that can show all the detailed settings?
> 
> I was thinking of setting it down to as little as 5 seconds.  And even 5 
> seconds might be too long.  In my specific use case, my failover script polls 
> the active partner every 10 seconds.  By default, if he doesn't respond in 2 
> intervals (20 seconds), I initiate my failover stuff.  When I start a 
> failover, I really really really need that /firewall-scripts directory to be 
> usable.   this specific use case, I'm not sure it makes sense to wait 20 
> seconds.  But before I mess with it, I want to see where it's set right now 
> so I have a baseline.  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> - Greg
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Turner [mailto:btur...@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:33 AM
> To: Greg Scott
> Cc: Joe Julian; gluster-users@gluster.org
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] One node goes offline, the other node can't see 
> the replicated volume anymore
> 
> You can set the timeout with:
> 
> $ gluster volume set <volname> network.ping-timeout <N>
> 
> I don't usually set it to anything under 20. 
> 
> -b
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Greg Scott" <gregsc...@infrasupport.com>
> > To: "Joe Julian" <j...@julianfamily.org>
> > Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:00:50 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] One node goes offline, the other node 
> > can't see the replicated volume anymore
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Still not out of the woods. I can get everything mounted on both nodes 
> > with my systemd service hack. But now I?m back to the original 
> > problem. Well, sort of. Here is the scenario.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > My Gluster volume named /firewall-scripts is mounted on both fw1 and fw2.
> > Trying to simulate a cable issue, on fw1, I do:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ifdown enp5s4
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > And now all access to my /firewall-scripts volume on fw1 goes away. 
> > Fw2 can see it after more than the mystical 42 seconds. When I do
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ifup enp4s4
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I still can?t see my /firewall-scripts volume on fw1 and it is no 
> > longer mounted. Not quite one minute later, my volume is mounted again 
> > and life goes on.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > If that 42 second timeout is settable, how do I set it for a better 
> > number for my application? The Gluster/Heartbeat network in this case 
> > will just be a cable connecting the two nodes.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > - Greg
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@gluster.org
> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:28:38 -0400
> From: Jacob Yundt <jyu...@gmail.com>
> To: Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com>
> Cc: gluster-users Discussion List <Gluster-users@gluster.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.4.0 and 3.3.2 released!
> Message-ID:
>                 
> <CAG0kxBd38oph7=pdKUN2DS1mEoCAkqesEOR=mua6rlhduwh...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> >> 2. In release Notes for 3.4.0 it is stated that ext4-issue has been
> >> addressed - does this mean that it is safe to use ext4 with later
> >> kernels now?
> >>
> >
> > There are no known problems with ext4 and 3.4.0, even with newer kernels.
> >
> 
> Just to be perfectly clear, does this mean that the DHT[1] problem
> with RHEL6 kernels > 2.6.32-267 has been resolved in gluster 3.4.0?
> If so, I'm probably going to start switching bricks to ext4 until I
> can get my xfs problem[2] resolved.
> 
> -Jacob
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838784
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958781
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:08:38 +0000
> From: Greg Scott <gregsc...@infrasupport.com>
> To: "'gluster-users@gluster.org'" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> Subject: [Gluster-users] How do I rotate **all** the Gluster logs?
> Message-ID:
>                 <33b641bb8e344afa919d35dc8a74ee3e@mail2013.infrasupport.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I know I can do:
> 
> gluster log rotate <volume name>
> 
> and I see how that rotates log files in /var/log/glusterfs/bricks.  This is 
> good.  But there's another log file, /var/log/glusterfs/<volume name>.log and 
> that one doesn't seem to rotate.    There are also a bunch of others in that 
> directory and I don't see any evidence the above command makes them rotate.
> 
> What am I missing?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> -          Greg Scott
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130719/fa431b4c/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> End of Gluster-users Digest, Vol 63, Issue 62
> *********************************************
> 
> 
> **
> 
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential 
> and/or privileged for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, 
> review, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance by others, and any 
> forwarding of this email or its contents, without the express permission of 
> the sender is strictly prohibited by law. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please contact the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and 
> destroy all copies.
> **
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to