Hi All, I am interested in some feedback on putting multiple bricks on one physical disk. Each brick being assigned to a different volume. Here is the scenario:
4 disks per server, 4 servers, 2x2 distribute/replicate I would prefer to have just one volume but need to do geo-replication on some of the data (but not all of it). My thought was to use two volumes, which would allow me to selectively geo-replicate just the data that I need to, by replicating only one volume. A couple of questions come to mind: 1) Any implications of doing two bricks for different volumes on one physical disk? 2) Will the "free space" across each volume still calculate correctly? IE, if one volume takes up 2/3 of the total physical disk space, will the second volume still reflect the correct amount of used space? 3) Am I being stupid/missing something obvious? Cheers, Dave
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
