Oops, you are right. I got misled by git-describe. Can you please add http://review.gluster.org/5414/ to the backport wishlist (for 3.4.2) - http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Backport_Wishlist
Thanks! Avati On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Michael Lampe <mlam...@googlemail.com>wrote: > Just checked nufa.c from the official 3.4.1 sources and things look very > much different from > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5414/2/xlators/cluster/dht/src/nufa.c > > There is surely no such fallback. > > -Michael > > > Michael Lampe wrote: > >> I'm using the 3.4.1-3.el5 packages from gluster.org. >> >> Am I perhaps misinterpreting the problem? >> >> -Michael >> >> Anand Avati wrote: >> >>> You are probably using 3.3 or older? This has been fixed in 3.4 ( >>> http://review.gluster.org/5414) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Avati >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Michael Lampe >>> <mlam...@googlemail.com>wrote: >>> >>> I've installed GlusterFS on our 23-node Beowulf cluster. Each node has a >>>> disc which provides a brick for the GlusterFS volume and every node >>>> mounts >>>> this volume. The NUFA translator is ideal for the code we run and >>>> everythings works fine so far. >>>> >>>> Only problem is the frontend node, which does not have a subvolume: >>>> After >>>> I've turned on NUFA, it no longer can mount the volume. :( >>>> >>>> [2013-12-04 21:35:44.262738] E [nufa.c:641:init] 0-gv0-dht: Could not >>>> find >>>> specified or local subvol >>>> [2013-12-04 21:35:44.262766] E [xlator.c:390:xlator_init] 0-gv0-dht: >>>> Initialization of volume 'gv0-dht' failed, review your volfile again >>>> [2013-12-04 21:35:44.262783] E [graph.c:292:glusterfs_graph_init] >>>> 0-gv0-dht: initializing translator failed >>>> [2013-12-04 21:35:44.262799] E [graph.c:479:glusterfs_graph_activate] >>>> 0-graph: init failed >>>> >>>> Is there any technical reason for treating things this way? Why cannot >>>> NUFA fall back to distribute, like it does when the local subvolume >>>> has not >>>> enough free space? >>>> >>>> Or is there a better way to include a frontend node? >>>> >>>> -Michael >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>> Gluster-users@gluster.org >>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users