Am 10.12.2013 06:39:47, schrieb Vijay Bellur: > On 12/08/2013 07:06 PM, Nguyen Viet Cuong wrote: > > Thanks for sharing. > > > > Btw, I do believe that GlusterFS 3.2.x is much more stable than 3.4.x in > > production. > >
> This is quite contrary to what we have seen in the community. From a > development perspective too, we feel much better about 3.4.1. Are there > specific instances that worked well with 3.2.x which does not work fine > for you in 3.4.x? 987555 - is that fixed in 3.5?Or did it even make it into 3.4.2couldn't find a note on that.Show stopper for moving from 3.2.x to anywhere for me! cheersb > > Cheers, > Vijay > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Bernhard Glomm IT Administration Phone: +49 (30) 86880 134 Fax: +49 (30) 86880 100 Skype: bernhard.glomm.ecologic Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH | Pfalzburger Str. 43/44 | 10717 Berlin | Germany GF: R. Andreas Kraemer | AG: Charlottenburg HRB 57947 | USt/VAT-IdNr.: DE811963464 Ecologic™ is a Trade Mark (TM) of Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users