Hi, My VM disk are based on RAW...
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Samuli Heinonen <samp...@neutraali.net> wrote: > Hi! > > What image type you are using to store virtual machines? For example using > sparse QCOW2 images is much slower than preallocated RAW images. > Performance with QCOW2 should get better after image file has grown bigger > and it's not necessary to resize sparse image anymore. > > Best regards, > Samuli Heinonen > > > On 13.2.2015, at 8.58, Punit Dambiwal <hypu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have seen the gluster performance is dead slow on the small files...even > i am using the SSD....it's too bad performance....even i am getting better > performance in my SAN with normal SATA disk... > > I am using distributed replicated glusterfs with replica count=2...i have > all SSD disks on the brick... > > root@vm3:~# dd bs=64k count=4k if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=dsync > > 4096+0 records in > > 4096+0 records out > > 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 57.3145 s, 4.7 MB/s > > > root@vm3:~# dd bs=64k count=4k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync > > 4096+0 records in > > 4096+0 records out > > 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.80093 s, 149 MB/s > > > Thanks, > > Punit > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users