hi Geoffrey,
Since you are saying it happens on all types of volumes,
lets do the following:
1) Create a dist-repl volume
2) Set the options etc you need.
3) enable gluster volume profile using "gluster volume profile <volname>
start"
4) run the work load
5) give output of "gluster volume profile <volname> info"
Repeat the steps above on new and old version you are comparing this
with. That should give us insight into what could be causing the slowness.
Pranith
On 06/02/2015 03:22 AM, Geoffrey Letessier wrote:
Dear all,
I have a crash test cluster where i’ve tested the new version of
GlusterFS (v3.7) before upgrading my HPC cluster in production.
But… all my tests show me very very low performances.
For my benches, as you can read below, I do some actions (untar, du,
find, tar, rm) with linux kernel sources, dropping cache, each on
distributed, replicated, distributed-replicated, single (single brick)
volumes and the native FS of one brick.
# time (echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; tar xJf
~/linux-4.1-rc5.tar.xz; sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches)
# time (echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; du -sh linux-4.1-rc5/; echo
3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches)
# time (echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; find linux-4.1-rc5/|wc -l;
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches)
# time (echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; tar czf linux-4.1-rc5.tgz
linux-4.1-rc5/; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches)
# time (echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; rm -rf linux-4.1-rc5.tgz
linux-4.1-rc5/; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches)
And here are the process times:
---------------------------------------------------------------
| | UNTAR | DU | FIND | TAR | RM |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| single | ~3m45s | ~43s | ~47s | ~3m10s | ~3m15s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m40s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| native FS | ~11s | ~4s | ~2s | ~56s | ~10s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
I get the same results, whether with default configurations with
custom configurations.
if I look at the side of the ifstat command, I can note my IO write
processes never exceed 3MBs...
EXT4 native FS seems to be faster (roughly 15-20% but no more) than
XFS one
My [test] storage cluster config is composed by 2 identical servers
(biCPU Intel Xeon X5355, 8GB of RAM, 2x2TB HDD (no-RAID) and Gb ethernet)
My volume settings:
single: 1server 1 brick
replicated: 2 servers 1 brick each
distributed: 2 servers 2 bricks each
dist-repl: 2 bricks in the same server and replica 2
All seems to be OK in gluster status command line.
Do you have an idea why I obtain so bad results?
Thanks in advance.
Geoffrey
-----------------------------------------------
Geoffrey Letessier
Responsable informatique & ingénieur système
CNRS - UPR 9080 - Laboratoire de Biochimie Théorique
Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique
13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris
Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letess...@cnrs.fr
<mailto:geoffrey.letess...@cnrs.fr>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users