Raghavendra and Raghavendra, Thanks, I will enable tracing and reply with logs. I will also rebuild my test bed to use simpler apache configs. I appreciate your efforts, it’s good to know we should expect things to “just work” as a starting point, that gives me hope we can fix this here. To that end, you’ve already helped immeasurably.
From: Raghavendra Bhat <rab...@redhat.com<mailto:rab...@redhat.com>> Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 5:56 AM To: "gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>" <gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>, Christian Rice <cr...@pandora.com<mailto:cr...@pandora.com>> Cc: Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com<mailto:rgowd...@redhat.com>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.6.3 performance.cache-size not working as expected in some cases On 09/02/2015 12:45 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote: you Hi Christian, I have been working on it since couple of days. I have not been able to recreate the issue. I will continue to recreate and get back to you in a day or two. Regards, Raghavendra Bhat Hi Christian, As per our tests (me and Raghavendra G in CC) we found that the data was being served from cache. In fact in our tests data was being served from the kernel cache itself. So we tried with dropping the data cache (i.e. echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) to see if the read requests coming to glusterfs (since the data cache in the kernel is dropped) . We found that the read calls were coming to glusterfs and glusterfs is serving the requests from the cache (i.e. io-cache xlator). If the memory pressure on the system is huge and kernel is sending forgets to the glusterfs client, then there is a possibility that the inodes are forgotten along with the data cached within them. Can you please enable trace log level for the client and run your tests? (gluster volume set <volname> client-log-level TRACE) Once your tests are done please give the logs. NOTE: Enabling trace log level will increase the log file size faster due to more logging. Regards, Raghavendra Bhat On 09/02/2015 12:45 AM, Christian Rice wrote: This is still an issue for me, I don’t need anyone to tear the code apart, but I’d be grateful if someone would even chime in and say “yeah, we’ve seen that too." From: Christian Rice <cr...@pandora.com<mailto:cr...@pandora.com>> Date: Sunday, August 30, 2015 at 11:18 PM To: "gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>" <gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>> Subject: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.6.3 performance.cache-size not working as expected in some cases I am confused about my caching problem. I’ll try to keep this as straightforward as possible and include the basic details... I have a sixteen node distributed volume, one brick per node, XFS isize=512, Debian 7/Wheezy, 32GB RAM minimally. Every brick node is also a gluster client, and also importantly an HTTP server. We use a back-end 1GbE network for gluster traffic (eth1). There are a couple dozen gluster client-only systems accessing this volume, as well. We had a really hot spot on one brick due to an oft-requested file, and every time any httpd process on any gluster client was asked to deliver the file, it was physically fetching it (we could see this traffic using, say, ‘iftop -i eth1’,) so we thought to increase the volume cache timeout and cache size. We set the following values for testing: performance.cache-size 16GB performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 30 This test was run from a node that didn’t have the requested file on the local brick: while(true); do cat /path/to/file > /dev/null; done and what had been very high traffic on the gluster backend network, delivering the data repeatedly to my requesting node, dropped to nothing visible. I thought good, problem fixed. Caching works. My colleague had run a test early on to show this perf issue, so he ran it again to sign off. His testing used curl, because all the real front end traffic is HTTP, and all the gluster nodes are web servers, which are of course using the fuse mount to access the document root. Even with our performance tuning, the traffic on the gluster backend subnet was continuous and undiminished. I saw no evidence of cache (again using ‘iftop -i eth1’, which showed a steady 75+% of line rate on a 1GbE link. Does that make sense at all? We had theorized that we wouldn’t get to use VFS/kernel page cache on any node except maybe the one which held the data in the local brick. That’s what drove us to setting the gluster performance cache. But it doesn’t seem to come into play with http access. Volume info: Volume Name: DOCROOT Type: Distribute Volume ID: 3aecd277-4d26-44cd-879d-cffbb1fec6ba Status: Started Number of Bricks: 16 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: <snipped list of bricks> Options Reconfigured: performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 30 performance.cache-size: 16GB The net result of being overwhelmed by a hot spot is all the gluster client nodes lose access to the gluster volume—it becomes so busy it hangs. When the traffic goes away (failing health checks by load balancers causes requests to be redirected elsewhere), the volume eventually unfreezes and life goes on. I wish I could type ALL that into a google query and get a lucid answer :) Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
