On 5 November 2015 at 21:55, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Although I do not have experience with VM live migration, IIUC, it is got > to do with a different server (and as a result a new glusterfs client > process) taking over the operations and mgmt of the VM. > Thats sounds very plausible > If this is a correct assumption, then I think this could be the result of > the same caching bug that I talked about sometime back in 3.7.5, which is > fixed in 3.7.6. > The issue could cause the new client to not see the correct size and block > count of the file, leading to errors in reads (perhaps triggered by the > restart of the vm) and writes on the image. > Cool, I look fwd to testing that in 3.7.6, which I believe is due out next week? thanks, -- Lindsay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
