On 6 November 2015 at 17:22, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Sure. So far I've just been able to figure that GlusterFS counts blocks in > multiples of 512B while XFS seems to count them in multiples of 4.0KB. > Let me again try creating sparse files on xfs, sharded and non-sharded > gluster volumes and compare the results. I'll let you know what I find. > Yes, that could complicate things. ZFS has available record size up to 1MB max. I'll try the same tests with XFS & EXT4 as well. -- Lindsay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
