the client statedump is at http://pastebin.centos.org/38671/
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, baul jianguo <roidi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3.5.7 also hangs.only the flush op hung. Yes,off the > performance.client-io-threads ,no hang. > > The hang does not relate the client kernel version. > > One client statdump about flush op,any abnormal? > > [global.callpool.stack.12] > > uid=0 > > gid=0 > > pid=14432 > > unique=16336007098 > > lk-owner=77cb199aa36f3641 > > op=FLUSH > > type=1 > > cnt=6 > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.1] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=fuse > > complete=0 > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.2] > > ref_count=0 > > translator=datavolume-write-behind > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume-read-ahead > > wind_from=ra_flush > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD (this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=ra_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.3] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume-read-ahead > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume-open-behind > > wind_from=default_flush_resume > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=default_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.4] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume-open-behind > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume-io-threads > > wind_from=iot_flush_wrapper > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=iot_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.5] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume-io-threads > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume > > wind_from=io_stats_flush > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=io_stats_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.6] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume > > complete=0 > > parent=fuse > > wind_from=fuse_flush_resume > > wind_to=xl->fops->flush > > unwind_to=fuse_err_cbk > > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko > <oleksa...@natalenko.name> wrote: >> With "performance.client-io-threads" set to "off" no hangs occurred in 3 >> rsync/rm rounds. Could that be some fuse-bridge lock race? Will bring that >> option to "on" back again and try to get full statedump. >> >> On четвер, 21 січня 2016 р. 14:54:47 EET Raghavendra G wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >>> >>> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On 01/18/2016 02:28 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> >> XFS. Server side works OK, I'm able to mount volume again. Brick is 30% >>> >> full. >>> > >>> > Oleksandr, >>> > >>> > Will it be possible to get the statedump of the client, bricks >>> > >>> > output next time it happens? >>> > >>> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/debugging/statedump.m >>> > d#how-to-generate-statedump >>> We also need to dump inode information. To do that you've to add "all=yes" >>> to /var/run/gluster/glusterdump.options before you issue commands to get >>> statedump. >>> >>> > Pranith >>> > >>> >> On понеділок, 18 січня 2016 р. 15:07:18 EET baul jianguo wrote: >>> >>> What is your brick file system? and the glusterfsd process and all >>> >>> thread status? >>> >>> I met same issue when client app such as rsync stay in D status,and >>> >>> the brick process and relate thread also be in the D status. >>> >>> And the brick dev disk util is 100% . >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko >>> >>> >>> >>> <oleksa...@natalenko.name> wrote: >>> >>>> Wrong assumption, rsync hung again. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On субота, 16 січня 2016 р. 22:53:04 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> >>>>> One possible reason: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on >>> >>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I've disabled both optimizations, and at least as of now rsync still >>> >>>>> does >>> >>>>> its job with no issues. I would like to find out what option causes >>> >>>>> such >>> >>>>> a >>> >>>>> behavior and why. Will test more. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On пʼятниця, 15 січня 2016 р. 16:09:51 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> >>>>>> Another observation: if rsyncing is resumed after hang, rsync itself >>> >>>>>> hangs a lot faster because it does stat of already copied files. So, >>> >>>>>> the >>> >>>>>> reason may be not writing itself, but massive stat on GlusterFS >>> >>>>>> volume >>> >>>>>> as well. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> 15.01.2016 09:40, Oleksandr Natalenko написав: >>> >>>>>>> While doing rsync over millions of files from ordinary partition to >>> >>>>>>> GlusterFS volume, just after approx. first 2 million rsync hang >>> >>>>>>> happens, and the following info appears in dmesg: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> === >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.924481] INFO: task rsync:10310 blocked for more than 120 >>> >>>>>>> seconds. >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.931948] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" >>> >>>>>>> disables this message. >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940748] rsync D ffff88207fc13680 0 10310 >>> >>>>>>> 10309 0x00000080 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940752] ffff8809c578be18 0000000000000086 >>> >>>>>>> ffff8809c578bfd8 >>> >>>>>>> 0000000000013680 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940756] ffff8809c578bfd8 0000000000013680 >>> >>>>>>> ffff880310cbe660 >>> >>>>>>> ffff881159d16a30 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940759] ffff881e3aa25800 ffff8809c578be48 >>> >>>>>>> ffff881159d16b10 >>> >>>>>>> ffff88087d553980 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940762] Call Trace: >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940770] [<ffffffff8160a1d9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940797] [<ffffffffa023a53d>] >>> >>>>>>> __fuse_request_send+0x13d/0x2c0 >>> >>>>>>> [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940801] [<ffffffffa023db30>] ? >>> >>>>>>> fuse_get_req_nofail_nopages+0xc0/0x1e0 [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940805] [<ffffffff81098350>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940809] [<ffffffffa023a6d2>] fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20 >>> >>>>>>> [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940813] [<ffffffffa024382f>] fuse_flush+0xff/0x150 [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940817] [<ffffffff811c45c4>] filp_close+0x34/0x80 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940821] [<ffffffff811e4ed8>] __close_fd+0x78/0xa0 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940824] [<ffffffff811c6103>] SyS_close+0x23/0x50 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940828] [<ffffffff81614de9>] >>> >>>>>>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >>> >>>>>>> === >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> rsync blocks in D state, and to kill it, I have to do umount --lazy >>> >>>>>>> on >>> >>>>>>> GlusterFS mountpoint, and then kill corresponding client glusterfs >>> >>>>>>> process. Then rsync exits. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Here is GlusterFS volume info: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> === >>> >>>>>>> Volume Name: asterisk_records >>> >>>>>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate >>> >>>>>>> Volume ID: dc1fe561-fa3a-4f2e-8330-ec7e52c75ba4 >>> >>>>>>> Status: Started >>> >>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 >>> >>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp >>> >>>>>>> Bricks: >>> >>>>>>> Brick1: >>> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/10_megaraid_0_3_9_x_0_4_3_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0 >>> >>>>>>> 1 >>> >>>>>>> /as >>> >>>>>>> te >>> >>>>>>> risk/records Brick2: >>> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/10_megaraid_8_5_14_x_8_6_16_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >>> >>>>>>> _ >>> >>>>>>> 01/ >>> >>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick3: >>> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/11_megaraid_0_5_4_x_0_6_5_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0 >>> >>>>>>> 2 >>> >>>>>>> /as >>> >>>>>>> te >>> >>>>>>> risk/records Brick4: >>> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/11_megaraid_8_7_15_x_8_8_20_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >>> >>>>>>> _ >>> >>>>>>> 02/ >>> >>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick5: >>> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/12_megaraid_0_7_6_x_0_13_14_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >>> >>>>>>> _ >>> >>>>>>> 03/ >>> >>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick6: >>> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/12_megaraid_8_9_19_x_8_13_24_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storag >>> >>>>>>> e >>> >>>>>>> _03 >>> >>>>>>> /a >>> >>>>>>> sterisk/records Options Reconfigured: >>> >>>>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on >>> >>>>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on >>> >>>>>>> client.event-threads: 2 >>> >>>>>>> network.inode-lru-limit: 4096 >>> >>>>>>> server.event-threads: 4 >>> >>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: on >>> >>>>>>> storage.linux-aio: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 4194304 >>> >>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.quick-read: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.read-ahead: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.flush-behind: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.write-behind: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.io-thread-count: 2 >>> >>>>>>> performance.cache-max-file-size: 1048576 >>> >>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 33554432 >>> >>>>>>> features.cache-invalidation: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on >>> >>>>>>> === >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> The issue reproduces each time I rsync such an amount of files. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> How could I debug this issue better? >>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> >>>>>>> Gluster-users@gluster.org >>> >>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>>>> gluster-de...@gluster.org >>> >>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>>> gluster-de...@gluster.org >>> >>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>> gluster-de...@gluster.org >>> >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Gluster-users mailing list >>> >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >>> >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Gluster-devel mailing list >>> > gluster-de...@gluster.org >>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
