On 02/08/2016 09:57 PM, Simon Turcotte-Langevin wrote:
Good day to you Pranith,
Once again, thank you for your time. Our use case does include a lot
of small files and the read performances must not be impacted by a
RELATIME-based solution. Even though this option could fix the
RELATIME behavior on GlusterFS, it looks like the impact of the
performance could be too great for us. Therefore, we will test the
solution, but we will also consider alternative ways to detect usage
of the files we serve.
hi Simon,
Yeah it is a trade off :-/. What is the kind of workload you
guys use? It would be nice to know what you guys(ubisoft) do in detail,
even if it is a blog or something where you guys explain it in detail it
would be fine. I remember you guys from gluster 3.4 days (vaguely
remember debugging root:root directory permission issues). What version
are you guys using nowadays? How has been the experience? What are your
pain points with gluster? This feedback helps in improving gluster.
Thanks
Pranith
Simon
*From:*Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* 8 février 2016 00:26
*To:* Simon Turcotte-Langevin <simon.turcotte-lange...@ubisoft.com>;
gluster-users@gluster.org
*Cc:* UPS_Development <ups_developm...@ubisoft.com>
*Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS behaviour on stat syscall
with relatime activated
On 02/06/2016 12:19 AM, Simon Turcotte-Langevin wrote:
Good day to you Pranith,
Thank you for your answer, it was exactly this. However, we still
have an issue with RELATIME on GlusterFS.
Stating the file does not modify atime anymore, with quick-read
disabled, however cat-ing the file does not replicate the atime.
This is because of open-behind feature. Disable open-behind with:
"gluster volume set <volname> open-behind off". I believe you will see
the atime behavior you want to see with it. This will reduce the
performance of small file reads (< 64KB). Instead of one lookup over
the network now it will do, lookup + open(This will be sent to both
the replica bricks which updates atime) + read (Only one of the
bricks). Let me know if you want any more information.
Pranith
If I touch manually the file, the atime (or utimes) is replicated
correctly.
So to sum it up:
·[node1] Touch –a file1
oàAccess time is right on [node1] [node2] and [node3]
·[node1] Cat file1
oàAccess time is right on [node1]
oàAccess time is wrong on [node2] and [node3]
Would you have any idea what is going on behind the curtain, and
if there is any way to fix that behavior?
Thank you,
Simon
*From:*Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* 5 février 2016 00:55
*To:* Simon Turcotte-Langevin
<simon.turcotte-lange...@ubisoft.com>
<mailto:simon.turcotte-lange...@ubisoft.com>;
gluster-users@gluster.org <mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>
*Cc:* UPS_Development <ups_developm...@ubisoft.com>
<mailto:ups_developm...@ubisoft.com>
*Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS behaviour on stat syscall
with relatime activated
On 02/03/2016 10:12 PM, Simon Turcotte-Langevin wrote:
Hi, we have multiple clusters of GlusterFS which are mostly
alike. The typical setup is as such:
-Cluster of 3 nodes
-Replication factor of 3
-Each node has 1 brick, mounted on XFS with RELATIME and
NODIRATIME
-Each node has 8 disks in RAID 0 hardware
The main problem we are facing is that observation of the
access time of a file on the volume will update the access time.
The steps to reproduce the problem are:
-Create a file (echo ‘some data’ > /mnt/gv0/file)
-Touch its mtime and atime to some past date (touch –d
19700101 /mnt/gv0/file)
-Touch its mtime to the current timestamp (touch –m /mnt/gv0/file)
-Stat the file until atime is updated (stat /mnt/gv0/file)
oSometimes it’s instant, sometimes it requires to execute the
above command a couple of time
atime changes on open call.
Quick-read xlator opens the file and reads the content on 'lookup'
which gets triggered in stat. It does that to serve reads from
memory to reduce number of network round trips for small files.
Could you disable that xlator and try the experiment? On my
machine the time didn't change after I disabled that feature using:
"gluster volume set <volname> quick-read off"
Pranith
On the IRC channel, I spoke to a developer (nickname ndevos)
who said that it might be a getxattr() syscall that could be
called when stat() is called on a replicated volume.
Anybody can reproduce this issue? Is it a bug, or is it
working as intended? Is there any workaround?
Thank you,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org>
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users