-Atin Sent from one plus one On 19-Feb-2016 7:47 pm, "Atin Mukherjee" <atin.mukherje...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Abhilash has already raised a concern and Gaurav is looking into it. My bad, he is Abhishek! > > -Atin > Sent from one plus one > > On 19-Feb-2016 7:07 pm, "songxin" <songxin_1...@126.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I create a replicate volume with 2 brick.And I frequently reboot my two nodes and frequently run “peer detach” “peer detach” “add-brick” "remove-brick". >> >> A borad ip: 10.32.0.48 >> >> B borad ip: 10.32.1.144 >> >> >> After that, I run "gluster peer status" on A board and it show as below. >> >> Number of Peers: 2 >> >> Hostname: 10.32.1.144 >> Uuid: bbe2a458-ad3d-406d-b233-b6027c12174e >> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) >> >> Hostname: 10.32.1.144 >> Uuid: bbe2a458-ad3d-406d-b233-b6027c12174e >> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) >> >> >> >> >> I don't understand why the 10.32.0.48 has two peers which are both 10.32.1.144. >> >> Does glusterd not check duplicate ip addr? >> >> Any can help me to answer my quesion? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Xin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users