On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Saravanakumar Arumugam <sarum...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > On 08/08/2016 08:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:37:43PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: >> > >> > On 08/07/2016 04:17 PM, ML mail wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Can someone explain me what is the op-version everybody is speaking >> about on the mailing list? >> > op-version is a way to determine which gluster version you are running. >> > >> > This is quite useful during upgrade process, to check for backward >> > compatibility. >> > >> > FYI - >> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/libglusterf >> s/src/globals.h#L21 >> >> Maybe there should be a page about the op-version at our upgrade guide >> (just got recently informed we have that page): >> http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/README/ > > > Agreed, we should highlight about op-version when there is a new feature > introduced which requires a cluster op-version bump up. Probably having a > metric of release vs op-version would benefit users to understand what > op-version they should run with. Any takers for this change? > > > I have raised a issue in glusterdocs .. will send a pull request. > https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/issues/143 > Excellent! Thank you, Saravana. > > > >> >> >> Niels >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > > > -- > > --Atin > > > -- > --Atin > > > -- --Atin
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users