Theoretically whatever you said is correct (at least from shard's perspective). Adding Rafi who's worked on tiering to know if he thinks otherwise.
It must be mentioned that sharding + tiering hasn't been tested as such till now by us at least. Did you try it? If so, what was your experience? -Krutika On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anybody? > > Il 05 set 2016 22:19, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" < > gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Is tiering with sharding usefull with VM workload? >> Let's assume a storage with tiering and sharding enabled, used for >> hosting VM images. >> Each shard is subject to tiering, thus the most frequent part of the >> VM would be cached on the SSD, allowing better performance. >> >> Is this correct? >> >> To put it simple, very simple, let's assume a webserver VM, with the >> following directory structure: >> >> /home/user1/public_html >> /home/user2/public_html >> >> both are stored on 2 different shards (i'm semplyfing). >> /home/user1/public_html has much more visits than user2. >> >> Would that shard cached on hot tier allowing faster access by the >> webserver? >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
