On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonni...@ulrar.net> wrote:
> > > > On the other hand at home, I tried to use GlusterFS for VM images in a > > simple replica 2 setup with Pacemaker for HA. VMs were constantly > > failing en masse even without making any changes. Very often the images > > got corrupted and had to be restored from backups. This was over a year > > ago but motivated me to try the VMs on MooseFS. Since then I've not had > > Yeah, there has been a lot of bad versions for VM, anything < 3.7.12 has > either huge heal problems or random corruption at runtime. That's why > I keep 3.7.12 everywhere, I know it works well at least with my config, > and since I have no use for the new feature why take the risk to update ? > > Interesting comments on MooseFS, I've seen it but never tried it yet > because of the single server managing the cluster, seems like a huge > risk. Guess there must be ways to have that role failover or something. > > I've locked myself more or less into the version of 3.8 I am running on as well right now as I just don't feel inclined to have to worry if anything in an update will give me issues. -- > Kevin Lemonnier > PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111 > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
