On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:59 PM, <lemonni...@ulrar.net> wrote: > > Fix is up @ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17160/ . The only thing which > > we'd need to decide (and are debating on) is that should we bypass this > > validation with rebalance start force or not. What do others think? > > I think that if you are specifying force, that's your business.
+1. I say we show warning in case of no --force. handle the case similar to replace-brick --force remove-brick commit force like way. > Maybe still > show a warning and ask for a yes / no confirmation after, in case some > people > use force "by default" ? > we had kept --force as an option to script gluster CLIs so the scripts / integrations would work without depending on stdin input. Regards, Amar > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
