OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any but
you never know.
I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming performance
found on Google searches.
There are lots of 'here it is and here is how to set it up'
articles/posts, but no 'ooh-wee-wow it is awesome' comments.
It seems that for most people Bonding has worked it kinks out and thus
serves its purpose perfectly fine, so no reason to change to Teaming.
That or they had Mahdi's experience with Teaming in its present state
and bonding just works better for now.
For now, I'll just use tried and true ALB bonding on this project. After
I have some free time I may play with it some more on a test bed we have
here.
Among the 'advantages' claimed for Teaming is the lower performance
overhead (though "low vs very-low" may not be significant)
https://github.com/jpirko/libteam/wiki/Bonding-vs.-Team-features
Thanks all for the feedback.
I'll let everyone know if my testing happens and if it is a significant
difference (good or bad).
-bill
On 6/19/2017 6:27 AM, David Gossage wrote:
I haven't done any testing of performance differences, but on my
oVirt/rhev i use standard bonding as that's that it supports. On the
stand along gluster nodes I use teaming for bonding.
Teaming may be slightly easier to manage, but not by much if you are
already used to bond setups. I haven't noticed any bugs or issues
using teaming.
*/David Gossage/*/*
*/
//*Carousel Checks Inc.| System Administrator*
*Office*708.613.2284
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 2:59 PM, wk <wkm...@bneit.com
<mailto:wkm...@bneit.com>> wrote:
I'm looking at tuning up a new site and the bonding issue came up
A google search reveals that the gluster docs (and Lindsay)
recommend balance-alb bonding.
However, "team"ing came up which I wasn't familiar with. Its
already in RH6/7 and Ubuntu and their Github page implies its stable.
The libteam.org <http://libteam.org> people seem to feel their
solution is more lightweight and it seems easy enough to setup.
Before I go down this path, I was curious if anyone had any
experience/comments with 'team'
It would be nice to get a little speed bump essentially for free.
-bill
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org>
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users