I actually have 4 bricks with no arbiters. Fixed quorum count of 1 assures the files will be accessible even if all but 1 brick go down. Performance is good enough, though it can always be better, of course.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 5:37 AM Andreas Davour <a...@update.uu.se wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Diego Remolina wrote: > > > The OP (me) has a two node setup. I am not sure how many nodes in Artem's > > configuration (he is running 4.0.2). > > > > It can make sense that the more bricks you have, the higher the > performance > > hit in certain conditions, given that supposedly one of the issues of > > gluster with many small files is that gluster has to stat the files in > all > > the bricks (I would assume where they reside), so this is what creates > the > > high latencies which lead to bad performance with many small files. > > > > I am no expert on the internals of how it works, so I am not 100% sure > > though. > > Ah! Look at that. I mixed up you and Artem. Sorry about that! > > /andreas > > -- > "economics is a pseudoscience; the astrology of our time" > Kim Stanley Robinson >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users