Anyone please reply.... On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:49 ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team, > > I upload some valgrind logs from my gluster 5.4 setup. This is writing to > the volume every 15 minutes. I stopped glusterd and then copy away the > logs. The test was running for some simulated days. They are zipped in > valgrind-54.zip. > > Lots of info in valgrind-2730.log. Lots of possibly lost bytes in > glusterfs and even some definitely lost bytes. > > ==2737== 1,572,880 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 391 > of 391 > ==2737== at 0x4C29C25: calloc (in > /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) > ==2737== by 0xA22485E: ??? (in > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) > ==2737== by 0xA217C94: ??? (in > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) > ==2737== by 0xA21D9F8: ??? (in > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) > ==2737== by 0xA21DED9: ??? (in > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) > ==2737== by 0xA21E685: ??? (in > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) > ==2737== by 0xA1B9D8C: init (in > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) > ==2737== by 0x4E511CE: xlator_init (in /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1) > ==2737== by 0x4E8A2B8: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1) > ==2737== by 0x4E8AAB3: glusterfs_graph_activate (in > /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1) > ==2737== by 0x409C35: glusterfs_process_volfp (in /usr/sbin/glusterfsd) > ==2737== by 0x409D99: glusterfs_volumes_init (in /usr/sbin/glusterfsd) > ==2737== > ==2737== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==2737== definitely lost: 1,053 bytes in 10 blocks > ==2737== indirectly lost: 317 bytes in 3 blocks > ==2737== possibly lost: 2,374,971 bytes in 524 blocks > ==2737== still reachable: 53,277 bytes in 201 blocks > ==2737== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users