On 6/18/20 12:41 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote
Top Poster ;-)
And in fact, it's not true. The clear message to me once was: we are not able
to make a kernel version.
Which I understood as: we have not the knowledge to do that.
Since that was quite some time before Red Hat stepped in there was still hope
that some day someone capable may come ...
Since 2009 when I entered the list there was not a single month where there
were no complaints about gluster being slow. I wonder if you could accept
after 11 years and the projects near death now that I was right from the very
first day.
This is an amazingly unreasonable comment.
First off ALL distributed file systems are slower than non-distributed
file systems.
Second ALL network file systems are slower than local hardware.
Kernel inclusion does not make for a radically faster implementation.
I have worked with Kernel included NFS and user space NFS
implementations and the performance differences have not been all that
amazingly radical.
If your so convinced that a kernel included file system is the answer
you are free to implement a solution.
I am sure the project maintainers would love to have someone come along
and improve the code.
--
Alvin Starr || land: (647)478-6285
Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
al...@netvel.net ||
________
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
