On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:44:28PM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote:
> HI Alexander,
> Thanks for the update. Initially, I also
> thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up and manage.
> Moreover, it's also hardware demanding. I think it's most suitable for a
> very large set-up with hundreds of clients.
I strongly disagree. I run a small (3 nodes) Ceph cluster in my homelab
and following the official docs it's pretty easy to set up. The hardware
demands mostly depend on what performance one needs - the more performance
(e.g. NVMe storage and 100 GBit networking) one wants, the more powerful
hardware one has to provide, as usual. My nodes are Intel D-1521 with
64G of (ECC, of course) RAM and Connect-X 4 cards running at 10 GBit
and storage on HDDs which provide reasonable performance for my needs - not
a HPC setup, of course.
> What do you think of MooseFS ? Have you or anyone else tried MooseFS. If
> yes, how was its performance?
Last time I looked, MooseFS needs a commercial license for the full feature
set (e.g. highly available metadata (_that_ is not negotiable!), erasure
oding, Windows clients) which killed it for my non-commercial use case.
Kind regards,
Alex.
--
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison
________
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
