Scott Cain wrote: > Hi Wes, > > What you are describing is not a built in feature; did you implement > that via a callback? Also, is it possible that the text you are looking > for is there but truncated because of the stylesheet?
Not a built in feature? From the CONFIGURE_HOWTO.html file: 21 category This option allows you to group tracks into different groups on the GBrowse display in addition to the default group called 'General'. For example, if you wanted several tracks to be in a separate group called ``Genes'', you would add this to each of the track defintions: category = Genes Note that it is not possible to make subcategories. If all tracks are categorized, then the ``General'' category will not be displayed. If you have used a ``category tables'' option in the [GENERAL] section of the configuration file, then the names of the tracks labeled with this category will be placed into a table of the appropriate dimensions. Tracks will be placed into the table in column-major format: you should first list stanzas for all rows of column 1, then all rows of column 2, etc. See the tutorial for more details. > Scott > > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:10 +1000, Wes Barris wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In our gbrowse databases we organize our tracks into categories such as >> "cow", "sheep", "human", etc. Normally, the category name is shown in >> parentheses after the track name (key) in the details area. However, >> when draggable tracks are enabled, the category name is no longer shown. >> I am guessing that this is an oversight in the draggable tracks >> implementation? -- Wes Barris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Gmod-gbrowse mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-gbrowse
