Dear Marco, > > no, I thought about the classical non-redundant representation 0 <= r < > > B^rn-1. > > On the other side... this redundancy shouldn't hurt your wrap-around > trick, does it?
in the use we have for GMP-ECM, I guess no. But I can imagine other (wrap-around trick) applications where one would need a non-redundant residue. Paul _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
