On 2013-02-28 10:43:20 +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: > ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes: > But I don't think using a __ prefix on symbols is appropriate, it would > be better to use the namespace gmp_* or maybe libgmp_*. > > I disagree. > > Any solution here is a compromise. And there are more drawbacks with > dropping the __ than retaining it. Hmm, perhaps we could use the prefix > iouyfvhbiqckbfgkuigblkiuyggggggcuyhfbg, to make things more clean? The > risk of an accidental collision should be quite limited, and there is > hopefully no paragraph in some standard document somewhere against which > we would be in breach. :-)
I don't understand why changing the __ prefix to a gmp_ or libgmp_ namespace would be a problem. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel