bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it writes: > May I suggest the following patch? I now it is kind of opposite the > "volatile" proposal to force non-optimising the function...
You're right a const is missing. Your patch looks fine to me. For consistency, maybe you want to use mp_ptr / mp_srcptr also in the definition in sec_aors_1.c. I think the conclusion was that volatile was not very useful for this function, but if we add that later, does it make any sense to have const volatile *ap? The intended meaning would be that writes are invalid, and that no reads should be optimized away. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel