On Mon, 25 May 2015, Torbjörn Granlund wrote:
Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> writes:
Now I've found it (and reported
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 ). Note that the same (?)
instruction is spelled differently in the same file:
bc+ 12, 28, L(9)
vs.
blt+ cr7, L(24)
Note that the former form works with clang 3.5 installs. A 3.6
regression?
Indeed...
(there is also a mix of using "7" vs "cr7")
and llvm is happy with the second form.
Please point me to the place where "7" is used.
Ah, no, my mistake, I got confused by the preprocessing.
--
Marc Glisse
_______________________________________________
gmp-devel mailing list
gmp-devel@gmplib.org
https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
