t...@gmplib.org (Torbjörn Granlund) writes: > I hope we don't we have to do that all at once, but can the mpn_gcd_11 > entry point be optional (via HAVE_NATIVE_*)? > > Yes, otherwise it'll never happen!
It's not obvious to me how to organize that. Can we do it like this? * gcd_11.c and gcd_1.c as separate source files. * There's no reason to override gcd_1 in assembly without also overriding gcd_11. To do that one can have either separate gcd_11.asm and gcd_1.asm, or have a single gcd_1.asm with both entrypoints. To support the latter case, gcd_11.c (which is still built) must put its implementation inside #if !HAVE_NATIVE_gcd_11. Does that work? Is there any simpler way? One could require separate asm files, but then existing files need to be split when gcd_11 is added. Longer term, maybe there's no need to have assembly gcd_1 at all. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
