Ciao, Il Ven, 23 Agosto 2019 7:37 am, Niels Möller ha scritto: > I've had a look at the latest gcd_11 asm, and it's really neat, > including naturally getting %rdx zero on return.
One question about PIC/PLT and the gcd_22 to gcd_11 tail-call. Is it safe to tail-call (jump to, in asm) another function that may not have the same return type? I mean, is it possible, for a program dynamically-linked to the library, to force the usage of another gcd_11 function returning its result in %rax as expected but not taking care of %rdx? I mean: such a gcd_11 function would be completely valid... Can the tail-call be forced as internal to the library? Or maybe it is so, by default... Ĝis, m _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
