"Marco Bodrato" <bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it> writes:

  Before:
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      32      matigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    23
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      64      matigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    39
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      64      pirigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    ∞
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      64      surigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    ∞
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      32      pirigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    ∞
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      32      surigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    ∞

  After:
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      32      matigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    7
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      64      matigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    15
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      64      pirigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    24
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      64      surigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    25
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      32      pirigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    ∞
  zen-pc-linux-gnu      32      surigentoo64.gmplib.org-stat    ∞

  As we can see, on mati, the thresholds was more than halved, on piri and
  suri, with the 64-bits ABI, the new code can be used...

Nice progress!

  Maybe it's worth distinguishing them somehow with our config.guess?

Yes, we should do that.

-- 
Torbjörn
Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
_______________________________________________
gmp-devel mailing list
gmp-devel@gmplib.org
https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel

Reply via email to