Marco Bodrato <bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it> writes: > limb = (unsigned int) sp[sn] >> (bits - shift);
That's easier to read than what I proposed. > Maybe the cast is unnecessary, because the C standard says that the > left operand of a shift operation is always promoted to (unsigned) int > if it is smaller, correct? I think so, but it's a bit subtle, so I'd prefer the explicit cast. Maybe worth a comment mentioning the problem case: mp_limb_t == unsigned char, bits == 8, shift == 0 Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
