On 14/01/11 01:46, Umut Tabak wrote:
Dear all,
Concerning this post,
http://geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/2011/006075.html
no replies came from the side of the developers, so here I am firing
again gently.
Although Christophe Geuzaine sometime ago wrote a reply that
partitioning is still somewhat experimental. But I experience
consistency problem, rather than experimentation issues. I would highly
appreciate if someone from the development team could kindly clarify why
the partition numbers can written to different locations of the tag
array. This is sth that puzzles me for the last one week.
Hi Umut,
I'm not quite sure I understand your question. The third tag tells how
many partitions an element belongs to; the next tags give these
partitions' ids. If a partition id is negative, it denotes a partition
in which the element is a ghost cell.
Is the confusion linked to the negative ids? (At the moment there is no
option to disable ghost cells--you need to recompile from the sources.)
Regards,
Umut
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
--
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
