Hi Christophe, Thanks for the quick reply.
I understand the error now, nevertheless, shouldn't it still be possible for me to mesh the rectangle as I mentioned? I.e. if I make the "compound line" transfinite, why can't I then make the surface itself transfinite? Best regards, Felipe -- Felipe Alves Portela MSc student in Aerospace Eng. at TU Delft http://www.linkedin.com/in/felipealvesportela On 12 March 2013 18:22, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12 Mar 2013, at 13:55, F. A. Portela <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a very basic question: is it possible to define a surface using a > compound line? I have been running into a strange error "Line Loop is > wrong" every time i select a compound line as part of the line loop, on the > other hand, if I select the lines which are part of the compound line, all > goes well. > > > > Indeed, we should definitely fix the syntax (or enhance the > documentation): compound lines do not behave as "expected" - you define > them to force the mesh, but you still use the underlying lines to define > the surfaces. > > > > The issue is that I want to have a transfinite rectangle, but one of the > sides is composed by two lines... > > > > Regards, > > Felipe > > > > -- > > Felipe Alves Portela > > MSc student in Aerospace Eng. at TU Delft > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/felipealvesportela > > _______________________________________________ > > gmsh mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > -- > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine > > > >
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
