Ohhhh, sure.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 7:06 AM Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuza...@uliege.be> wrote: > > > > On 7 Oct 2018, at 10:30, Santiago Serebrinsky <sserebrin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > With Gmsh 2.2 format, it was very easy to tell which elements were > associated with each of the PhysicalEntities. Such tag was present in the > line describing the element data. > > > > With Gmsh 4, I could not find such association. > > Every element is part of a block with a given tagEntity, but I found no > relation between those tagEntity values and PhysicalNames. > > > > Is that described anywhere? > > Yes, in the $Entities section (see > http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#File-formats): each elementary > entity can be associated to a number of physical groups. > > Christophe > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Santiago > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gmsh mailing list > > gmsh@onelab.info > > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > — > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine > > Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info > >
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list gmsh@onelab.info http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
