Martin Höfling wrote:
Hi Folks, I struggle with the output of g_dipoles, just to make sure that I understood it right:

I select a subpart of my simulation and get the following output:

Average volume over run is 216

Dipole moment (Debye)
---------------------
Average  =   0.4463  Std. Dev. =   0.5010  Error =   0.0003

average dipole per molecule


Is this the dipole moment of my group normalized to the volume? I especially do not understand the difference between this value and the following ones.
volume does not enter these values at all.


The following averages for the complete trajectory have been calculated:

 Total < M_x > = -2.20102 Debye
 Total < M_y > = -1.65231 Debye
 Total < M_z > = -2.24414 Debye

OK these are the component average values over time from dipole moment of my group.

 Total < M_x^2 > = 1200.66 Debye^2
 Total < M_y^2 > = 1200.07 Debye^2
 Total < M_z^2 > = 1252.29 Debye^2

Average deviation from zero (squared) from each component over time.

 Total < |M|^2 > = 3653.02 Debye^2

Same thing for total Dipole momentum.

 Total < |M| >^2 = 12.6108 Debye^2

Average orientation (squared) of the total dipole momentum of my group over time.

Is that correct?
yes.

Ok, now if i g_analyze -f Mtot.xvg -ee

Read 4 sets of 1001 points, dt = 5

                                      std. dev.    relative deviation of
                       standard       ---------   cumulants from those of
set      average       deviation      sqrt(n-1)   a Gaussian distribition
                                                      cum. 3   cum. 4
SS1  -2.201018e+00   3.458052e+01   1.093532e+00      -0.114    0.021
SS2  -1.652311e+00   3.460259e+01   1.094230e+00       0.016   -0.018
SS3  -2.244139e+00   3.531650e+01   1.116806e+00      -0.004    0.008
SS4   5.565348e+01   2.357344e+01   7.454575e-01       0.332   -0.002

Hmm, these values in the first column deviate from the (sqrt) of the above ones for the components and total one.
because you have only the values in the xvg file, while the edr file stores more statistics.


Thanks for any comments.

Btw, in the 3.3 manual, e*nm is stated as dipole moment unit. I checked the sourcecode of g_dipoles and afair, the units there are still in Debye.
yes it's debye, because that is what people understand. should update the manual than.


Cheers
        Martin
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,          75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205          fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to